[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140912200355.GD9234@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:03:55 +0100
From: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce sleep-arm.c
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:43:36PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 10:00 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> >
> > ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
> > ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() for device power
> > managment, so introduce sleep-arm.c to allow other drivers to function
> > until S states are defined.
>
> Aside: ACPI5.1 does define the Platform Communication Channel and CPC
> (Collaborative Processor Performance Control). Some details need to be
> fleshed out there for practical 64-bit ARMv8 server systems, but the
> underpinnings and mechanisms are in place in the 5.1 specification that
> can be built upon over time to achieve practical S-State equivalence.
>
Disagree, S-States are about going to sleep or hibernating, that is
nothing to do with CPU Performance.
Graeme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists