lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140912234846.GA28183@mtj.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:48:46 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 1/2] freezer: check OOM kill while being frozen Hello, Michal. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:24:17PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > What do you think about this way to help distinguish kernel threads and > user processes and keep the future maintenance of freezer saner? I'm not sure either way. Please note that we have quite a few wrappers around try_to_freeze() - freezable_schedule*() and wait_event_freezable*() - and several places where a userland can be frozen. Are we gonna introduce an alternate versions for all of them? What do we actually gain? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists