linux-kernel - [PATCH 8/9] locktorture: Support rwsems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1410496890.2166.11.camel@linux-t7sj.site>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:41:30 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...olabs.net, dbueso@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] locktorture: Support rwsems

We can easily do so with our new reader lock support. Just an arbitrary
design default: readers have higher (5x) critical region latencies than
writers: 50 ms and 10 ms, respectively.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
 Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt |  2 ++
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c          | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
index 1bdeb71..f7d99e2 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ torture_type	  Type of lock to torture. By default, only spinlocks will
 
 		     o "mutex_lock": mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() pairs.
 
+		     o "rwsem_lock": read/write down() and up() semaphore pairs.
+
 torture_runnable  Start locktorture at module init. By default it will begin
 		  once the module is loaded.
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index c1073d7..8480118 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -265,6 +265,71 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops mutex_lock_ops = {
 	.name		= "mutex_lock"
 };
 
+static DECLARE_RWSEM(torture_rwsem);
+static int torture_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(torture_rwsem)
+{
+	down_write(&torture_rwsem);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_rwsem_write_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+{
+	const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100;
+
+	/* We want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention.  */
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) %
+	      (nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms)))
+		mdelay(longdelay_ms * 10);
+	else
+		mdelay(longdelay_ms / 10);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (nrealwriters_stress * 20000)))
+		preempt_schedule();  /* Allow test to be preempted. */
+#endif
+}
+
+static void torture_rwsem_up_write(void) __releases(torture_rwsem)
+{
+	up_write(&torture_rwsem);
+}
+
+static int torture_rwsem_down_read(void) __acquires(torture_rwsem)
+{
+	down_read(&torture_rwsem);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void torture_rwsem_read_delay(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
+{
+	const unsigned long longdelay_ms = 100;
+
+	/* We want a long delay occasionally to force massive contention.  */
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) %
+	      (nrealwriters_stress * 2000 * longdelay_ms)))
+		mdelay(longdelay_ms * 2);
+	else
+		mdelay(longdelay_ms / 2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+	if (!(torture_random(trsp) % (nrealreaders_stress * 20000)))
+		preempt_schedule();  /* Allow test to be preempted. */
+#endif
+}
+
+static void torture_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(torture_rwsem)
+{
+	up_read(&torture_rwsem);
+}
+
+static struct lock_torture_ops rwsem_lock_ops = {
+	.writelock	= torture_rwsem_down_write,
+	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
+	.writeunlock	= torture_rwsem_up_write,
+	.readlock       = torture_rwsem_down_read,
+	.read_delay     = torture_rwsem_read_delay,
+	.readunlock     = torture_rwsem_up_read,
+	.name		= "rwsem_lock"
+};
+
 /*
  * Lock torture writer kthread.  Repeatedly acquires and releases
  * the lock, checking for duplicate acquisitions.
@@ -467,7 +532,8 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 	int i, j;
 	int firsterr = 0;
 	static struct lock_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
-		&lock_busted_ops, &spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops, &mutex_lock_ops,
+		&lock_busted_ops, &spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
+		&mutex_lock_ops, &rwsem_lock_ops,
 	};
 
 	if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &torture_runnable))
-- 
1.8.4.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/