[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54127DC3.40107@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:59:47 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables
On 09/11/2014 08:02 PM, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-09-11, Hansen, Dave wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 01:46 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>>> + * This function will be called by do_munmap(), and the VMAs
>>> + covering
>>> + * the virtual address region start...end have already been split
>>> + if
>>> + * necessary and remvoed from the VMA list.
>>
>> "remvoed" -> "removed"
>>
>>> +void mpx_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end) {
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = mpx_try_unmap(mm, start, end);
>>> + if (ret == -EINVAL)
>>> + force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
>>> +}
>>
>> In the case of a fault during an unmap, this just ignores the
>> situation and returns silently. Where is the code to retry the
>> freeing operation outside of mmap_sem?
>
> Dave, you mean delayed_work code? According to our discussion, it
> will be deferred to another mainline post.
OK, fine. Just please call that out in the description.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists