lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140913152438.GA3072@kroah.com> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:24:38 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown > "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same > (battery defect?). > The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. > > Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery > [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9 First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@...r.kernel.org, not just to me. Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are they not sufficient? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists