[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140913152438.GA3072@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:24:38 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown
> "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same
> (battery defect?).
> The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+.
>
> Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9
First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@...r.kernel.org,
not just to me.
Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix
in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't
taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are
they not sufficient?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists