[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410647981.3040.21.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:39:41 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/131] 3.2.63-rc1 review
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 06:30 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 05:32 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.63 release.
> > There are 131 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat Sep 13 12:32:13 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 111 pass: 106 fail: 5
> Failed builds:
> 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	xtensa:defconfig
> 	xtensa:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 18 pass: 17 fail: 1
> Failed tests:
> 	microblaze:microblaze_defconfig
> 
> Results are as expected and an improvement over previous releases,
> where sparc64:allmodconfig used to fail as well. The failing qemu
> test was added to the list of tests only recently and is a known
> problem.
Thanks for testing!
Ben.
-- 
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
