lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140913031156.GA948@swordfish> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:11:56 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: use notify_free to account all free notifications Hello Minchan, On (09/12/14 08:21), Minchan Kim wrote: > Hey Sergey, > > Sorry for late review. > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:57:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > notify_free device attribute accounts the number of slot free notifications > > and internally represents the number of zram_free_page() calls. Slot free > > notifications are sent only when device is used as a swap device, hence > > notify_free is used only for swap devices. Since f4659d8e620d08 (zram: > > support REQ_DISCARD) ZRAM handles yet another one free notification (also > > via zram_free_page() call) -- REQ_DISCARD requests, which are sent by a > > filesystem, whenever some data blocks are discarded. However, there is no > > way to know the number of notifications in the latter case. > > > > Use notify_free to account the number of pages freed in zram_free_page(), > > instead of accounting only swap_slot_free_notify() calls (each > > zram_slot_free_notify() call frees one page). > > > > This means that depending on usage scenario notify_free represents: > > a) the number of pages freed because of slot free notifications, which is > > equal to the number of swap_slot_free_notify() calls, so there is no > > behaviour change > > > > b) the number of pages freed because of REQ_DISCARD notifications > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> > > --- > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram | 13 ++++++++----- > > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram > > index b13dc99..a6148ea 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram > > @@ -77,11 +77,14 @@ What: /sys/block/zram<id>/notify_free > > Date: August 2010 > > Contact: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> > > Description: > > - The notify_free file is read-only and specifies the number of > > - swap slot free notifications received by this device. These > > - notifications are sent to a swap block device when a swap slot > > - is freed. This statistic is applicable only when this disk is > > - being used as a swap disk. > > + The notify_free file is read-only. Depending on device usage > > + scenario it may account a) the number of pages freed because > > + of swap slot free notifications or b) the number of pages freed > > + because of REQ_DISCARD requests sent by bio. The former ones > > + are sent to a swap block device when a swap slot is freed, which > > + implies that this disk is being used as a swap disk. The latter > > + ones are sent by filesystem mounted with discard option, > > + whenever some data blocks are getting discarded. > > > > What: /sys/block/zram<id>/zero_pages > > Date: August 2010 > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > > index d78b245..bc20fe1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > > @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index) > > atomic64_sub(zram_get_obj_size(meta, index), > > &zram->stats.compr_data_size); > > atomic64_dec(&zram->stats.pages_stored); > > + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free); > > It is wrong. The zram_free_page is called at several places and > they are all not notify free. > Pz, account it in zram_slot_free_notify and zram_bio_discard. wow, why did I do that... good catch! will resend shortly. sorry. -ss > > > > meta->table[index].handle = 0; > > zram_set_obj_size(meta, index, 0); > > @@ -938,7 +939,6 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev, > > bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); > > zram_free_page(zram, index); > > bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); > > - atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free); > > } > > > > static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = { > > -- > > 2.1.0.134.gb1ae451 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists