[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE017A5821@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:24:02 +0000
From: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 04/10] x86, mpx: hook #BR exception handler to
allocate bound tables
On 2014-09-13, Hansen, Dave wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 01:46 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> +static int allocate_bt(long __user *bd_entry) {
>> + unsigned long bt_addr, old_val = 0;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + bt_addr = mpx_mmap(MPX_BT_SIZE_BYTES);
>> + if (IS_ERR((void *)bt_addr))
>> + return bt_addr;
>> + bt_addr = (bt_addr & MPX_BT_ADDR_MASK) |
> MPX_BD_ENTRY_VALID_FLAG;
>
> Qiaowei, why do we need the "& MPX_BT_ADDR_MASK" here?
It should be not necessary, and can be removed.
Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists