linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Implement /proc/built-in file similar to /proc/modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyW8CWxkN=k5DE3OQ7HYTTMysOVttnrZGf7FTp53Z9Now@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:12:45 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	tkhai@...dex.ru
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ktkhai@...allels.com, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Implement /proc/built-in file similar to /proc/modules

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru> wrote:
> On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>>> This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
>>>> to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
>>>
>>> Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ?  Doesn't that show what you want
>>> here?
>>
>> Well, /sys/module/ doesn't list the modules (drivers) compiled in. Say,
>> /sys/module/kernel. And it can't help a user to figure out that, say, the
>> loop driver is already "loaded" because CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y.
>>
>>> Module names aren't "standardized", we change them at times when needed,
>>> just like CONFIG_ names.
>>
>> OK, but still the name will be the same, in /proc/modules or /proc/builtin.
>>
>>> What is your end goal here?  As you say, config.gz is the real kernel
>>> configuration, just having a list of modules built in isn't going to
>>> help much in getting a working kernel config without it.
>>
>> Perhaps you are right... but otoh perhaps this can can be useful anyway.
>> Again, a user can know about "insmod loop", but he can know nothing
>> about CONFIG_ names.
>>
>> That said, I do not really understand 2/3. Not only I do not understand
>> this kbuild magic, I am not sure I understand what /proc/built-in will
>> actually show.
>
> It's a list of drivers, one driver per line:

Built-in modules or drivers? :-)

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/