linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: use MAX_BIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:34:51 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: use MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(sbi)

On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 15:14 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch cleans up a simple macro.

There seems to be many different types used here.

	MAX_BIO_BLOCKS returns unsigned int
	bio_blocks is int,
	blocks_per_seg is unsigned int,
	ra_meta_pages(,,int,)
	nr_pages_to_skip uses int
	nr_pages_to_write returns a long

Perhaps it'd be nicer to standardize the type
so there'd be fewer promotions/implicit casts.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/