[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140914062116.GA23868@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:21:17 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Rusty away 18th September -- 11th October
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:58:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:26:52AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Probably won't read mail. Linus, I'll have pull requests early
> >> next week; if there's anything needed I'm sure Michael Tsirkin can
> >> handle it.
> >
> > Sure.
> > Rusty, there's a small chance virtio 1.0 bits will be ready in time.
> > I started working on them based on your virtio-pci-new-layout branch.
> >
> > If ready before the merge window, are you ok with me merging this
> > support (without you having the opportunity to review first)?
>
> Sorry, absolutely not. I *really* want to review this in depth; if we
> make a mistake, it's going to hurt us significantly.
Right but it's only a merge window - we can fix bugs and even disable
the new driver afterwards, can't we?
> And until we have the qemu bits ready, it's really hard to tell if we've
> got this right.
Sure, I meant if qemu bits are ready too, and if things work together.
It wouldn't do to merge a driver that isn't ready.
> So I'd rather delay and make sure we're solid.
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
Something else we can do, is refactoring that splits driver
out to common and legacy bits, and changes APIs.
No?
--
MSt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists