linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13 020/187] sparc64: Handle 32-bit tasks properly in compute_effective

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1410818997-9432-21-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:07:10 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 020/187] sparc64: Handle 32-bit tasks properly in compute_effective_address().

3.13.11.7 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>

[ Upstream commit d037d16372bbe4d580342bebbb8826821ad9edf0 ]

If we have a 32-bit task we must chop off the top 32-bits of the
64-bit value just as the cpu would.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c
index 3c1a7cb..35ab8b6 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c
@@ -166,17 +166,23 @@ static unsigned long *fetch_reg_addr(unsigned int reg, struct pt_regs *regs)
 unsigned long compute_effective_address(struct pt_regs *regs,
 					unsigned int insn, unsigned int rd)
 {
+	int from_kernel = (regs->tstate & TSTATE_PRIV) != 0;
 	unsigned int rs1 = (insn >> 14) & 0x1f;
 	unsigned int rs2 = insn & 0x1f;
-	int from_kernel = (regs->tstate & TSTATE_PRIV) != 0;
+	unsigned long addr;
 
 	if (insn & 0x2000) {
 		maybe_flush_windows(rs1, 0, rd, from_kernel);
-		return (fetch_reg(rs1, regs) + sign_extend_imm13(insn));
+		addr = (fetch_reg(rs1, regs) + sign_extend_imm13(insn));
 	} else {
 		maybe_flush_windows(rs1, rs2, rd, from_kernel);
-		return (fetch_reg(rs1, regs) + fetch_reg(rs2, regs));
+		addr = (fetch_reg(rs1, regs) + fetch_reg(rs2, regs));
 	}
+
+	if (!from_kernel && test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))
+		addr &= 0xffffffff;
+
+	return addr;
 }
 
 /* This is just to make gcc think die_if_kernel does return... */
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/