linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: proc: use __seq_open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5416ECC4.1020200@codethink.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:42:28 +0100
From:	Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...ethink.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()



On 12/09/14 22:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:37 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Reduce boilerplate code by using __seq_open_private() instead of seq_open().
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-proc-task_nommuc-change-maps_open-to-use-__seq_open_private.patch
> already did this.
>

Great. Too recent to be in my source tree though, I'm afraid.

Even so, it's nice to see that his code is identical to mine (except
for the assign-on-declaration, I prefer the whitespace, but hey).

I wonder if this was triggered by my documentation patch for the
routine. If so, that makes me happy :-)

-- 
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk
tel:+44 161 236 5575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/