[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5416F69C.8040905@converseincode.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:24:28 -0700
From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
llvmlinux@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the llvmlinux tree with the tree
On 09/14/14 23:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the llvmlinux tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c between commit fc886107c556 ("drm/msm:
> Change nested function to static function") from the watchdog tree and
> commit 8f2c494adad0 ("msm, hdmi: LLVMLinux: Remove nested function from
> HDMI driver") from the llvmlinux tree.
>
> I fixed it up (these patches are doing the same thing, so I used the
> version in the watchdog tree) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
>
> P.S. Behan, I noticed that the llvmlinux patch has no Signed-off-by
> from you even though you committed it ...
Drat. That patch wasn't supposed to be in there. Sorry about that.
Yeah. That one was accepted upstream already. I was carrying it in my
repos so we could still build until it made it to mainline. I should not
have put that in linux-next. I actually just had to pull it out of my
own builds due to the same merge issue.
Hmm. Seems I put a couple of patches into the for-next branch late last
night which shouldn't have been. Fixed.
Apologies,
Behan
--
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists