[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410801517.3817.13.camel@hornet>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:18:37 +0100
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf: Marker software event and ioctl
On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 16:43 +0100, David Ahern wrote:
> >> Seems really similar to what I proposed in the past:
Yeah, it wasn't really hard to come with similar conclusions :-)
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/27/159
> >>
> >> Which was rejected.
> >
> > I took a look at that thread, but just barely, emphasis on that.
> >
> > Injecting something from userspace, a la ftrace, seems to be something,
> > as tglx mentioned, "buried" in that patchset.
>
> Thomas object to an ioctl buried deep in a patch -- newbie mistake.
>
> Peter objected to the ioctl https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/1/229
>
> It was not userspace injecting random data into the stream but rather
> forcing the sample to be generated and added to the stream.
I would like to hear from Peter and others. If not here, I'll get them
to talk next month on Linux Plumbers :-)
Pawel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists