[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140915183334.GA30737@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:33:34 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
Cc: "'linux@....linux.org.uk'" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64:free_initrd_mem should also free the memblock
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:17:18AM +0100, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> this patch fix the memblock statics for memblock
> in file /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved
> if we don't call memblock_free the initrd will still
> be marked as reserved, even they are freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@...ymobile.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 5472c24..34605c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -334,8 +334,10 @@ static int keep_initrd;
>
> void free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> - if (!keep_initrd)
> + if (!keep_initrd) {
> free_reserved_area((void *)start, (void *)end, 0, "initrd");
> + memblock_free(__pa(start), end - start);
> + }
I don't think it makes any technical difference, but doing the memblock_free
before the free_reserved_area makes more sense to me.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists