linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: fan53555: set regulator name from constraints name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:08:12 +0200
From:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: fan53555: set regulator name from constraints name

Am Montag, 15. September 2014, 09:59:23 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > There is a high potential of more than one of those regulators existing
> > on a board, so name the regulator according to the name provided in the
> > initdata instead of statically.
> 
> No, this is pointless and broken.  The core will already use the
> board-specific name to identify the regulator in diagnostics and so on,
> the name being supplied here is supposed to describe the regulator
> within the device.

ok, sorry for the mess-up

I've just tested, patches 3-5 apply and work correctly without this one, so do 
you want to apply them like this or a resend of last 3?


Heiko
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)