[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1410872360-27029-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:59:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] amba/dma: pl330: add Power Management support
Hi,
This is fifth version of patches adding runtime PM to the pl330
driver.
The runtime PM of pl330 driver requires interrupt safe suspend/resume
callbacks which is in conflict with current amba bus driver.
The latter also unprepares and prepares the AMBA bus clock which
is not safe for atomic context.
The patchset solves this in patch 3/4 by handling clocks in different
way if device driver set interrupt safe runtime PM.
Any comments are welcome.
Tested on boards with pl330 DMA driver:
- Trats2 (Exynos4212)
- Samsung Gear2-like development board (Exynos3250)
TODO/ideas:
===========
Consider renaming existing pm_runtime_irq_safe() function to keep
up with naming convention after adding pm_runtime_is_irq_safe() in
patch 1/4.
This naming:
- pm_runtime_irq_safe() as setter,
- pm_runtime_is_irq_safe() as getter,
is contradictory to naming of other PM runtime functions, e.g.:
- pm_runtime_set_active() as setter,
- pm_runtime_active() as getter.
I didn't change the naming of pm_runtime_irq_safe() because I wanted
to minimize the impact of the patches.
Changes since v4:
=================
1. Patch 3/4: Explicitly initialize amba_device.irq_safe field after
probing driver (suggested by Russell King).
Changes since v3:
=================
1. Patch 1/4: Document new API in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
(pointed by Alan Stern).
Changes since v2:
=================
1. Add patch 1 (PM / Runtime: Add getter for quering the IRQ safe option)
2. Add patch 2 (amba: Add helper macros for (un)preparing AMBA clock)
3. Patch 3/4: Rewrite the idea. If IRQ safe runtime PM is set then
do not unprepare/prepare the clocks. Suggested by Russell King.
4. Patch 4/4: During system sleep unprepare the clock.
Changes since v1:
=================
1. Add patch 1 (amba: Allow AMBA drivers to use their own runtime PM).
2. Patch 2/2: Apply Michal Simek's suggestions.
3. Patch 2/2: Fix atomic context safeness in pl330_issue_pending().
Best regards,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
PM / Runtime: Add getter for quering the IRQ safe option
amba: Add helper macros for (un)preparing AMBA clock
amba: Don't unprepare the clocks if device driver wants IRQ safe
runtime PM
dma: pl330: add Power Management support
Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt | 4 ++
drivers/amba/bus.c | 29 ++++++++++++--
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/amba/bus.h | 7 ++++
include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 6 +++
5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists