linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm: Convert pr_warning to pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140916160759.GJ12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:07:59 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm: Convert pr_warning to pr_warn

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:56:56PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:31:12PM +0100, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use the more common pr_warn.
> > 
> > Other miscellanea:
> > 
> > o Coalesce formats
> > o Realign arguments
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h   |  8 ++++----
> >  arch/arm/kernel/atags_parse.c    |  2 +-
> >  arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c  | 18 +++++++++---------
> >  arch/arm/kernel/irq.c            |  4 ++--
> >  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c |  4 ++--
> >  arch/arm/kernel/smp.c            |  2 +-
> >  arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c         | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> >  arch/arm/mm/idmap.c              |  2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                |  4 ++--
> >  9 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> It's Russell's call on this, but it really looks like more trouble than it's
> worth imo. Having git blame identify the person who wrote the original code
> is considerably more useful than being pointed at somebody making cosmetic
> changes.

I have no objection to this patch set, but I'll echo Will's comment
that having git blame identify who wrote the code is useful.

However, removing old cruft is also a useful exercise, as it keeps
things simpler (because we're not carrying around lots of excess
baggage.)  So, I think on balance it's worth the churn.

Joe, any chance you could add a KernelVersion: tag somewhere in the
commit message and throw it at patches@....linux.org.uk so it doesn't
get lost?

Thanks.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/