[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DC148C5AA1CEBA4E87973D432B1C2D8825FA452D@P3PWEX4MB008.ex4.secureserver.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:13:20 +0000
From: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@...ionengravers.com>
To: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/11] staging: comedi: move comedi_fc functionality
into core
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:44 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 15/09/14 19:21, Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Other than I think the comedi_fc.c functions should be migrated to
>> comedi_buf.c instead of drivers.c I have not problems with this.
>
> I think it's debatable. The only one of the three functions you
> mentioned that touches the buffer is comedi_inc_scan_progress(), and I'd
> rather keep that with comedi_bytes_per_scan().
Fair enough. I might end up moving some of them later based on some patches
I'm working on, but for now having them in drivers.c is fine.
>> And, patch 11 does have a conflict with your "... use dma_alloc_coherent..."
>> patches.
>
> Yes, I'll have to fix up one or the other, depending which gets applied
> first (unless git can magically sort it out with a three way merge).
If not it's an easy rebase.
Regards,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists