linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:32:31 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...escale.com>,
	shawn.guo@...escale.com, timur@...i.org, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of
 spdif in driver

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> So I think, if it's a shared clock, we should not define it as a
> rate-changeable one in the SoC level, as we might still have some
> SoCs provide a dedicated clock to S/PDIF so as to get the maximum
> range of clock support for users.

> @Shawn
> Sorry to involve you in this topic. I'm not so sure if we can do
> this in the clock driver so that the clock rate would be fixed
> even if the driver is trying to change it. If we can, I think we
> may use a better solution here instead.

I tend to agree here.  My first thought here is that we should have
support in the clock API for constraining clocks in the clock API so we
can still set the clock where there's a possibility to do that.  Not
trivail to implement though.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)