lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140916193507.GN4723@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:35:08 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] locktorture: Add documentation

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:10:19PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/11/14 20:40, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Just like Documentation/RCU/torture.txt, begin a document for the
> > locktorture module. This module is still pretty green, so I have
> > just added some specific sections to the doc (general desc, params,
> > usage, etc.). Further development should update the file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt

Thank you for the review, Randy!  I am folding the patch below into
Davidlohr's patch.

							Thanx, Paul

> > diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..c0ab969
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> > +Kernel Lock Torture Test Operation
> > +
> > +CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST
> > +
> > +The CONFIG LOCK_TORTURE_TEST config option provides a kernel module
> > +that runs torture tests on core kernel locking primitives. The kernel
> > +module, 'locktorture', may be built after the fact on the running
> > +kernel to be tested, if desired. The tests periodically outputs status
> 
>                                                            output
> 
> > +messages via printk(), which can be examined via the dmesg (perhaps
> > +grepping for "torture").  The test is started when the module is loaded,
> > +and stops when the module is unloaded. This program is based on how RCU
> > +is tortured, via rcutorture.
> > +
> > +This torture test consists of creating a number of kernel threads which
> > +acquires the lock and holds it for specific amount of time, thus simulating
> 
>    acquire               hold
> 
> > +different critical region behaviors. The amount of contention on the lock
> > +can be simulated by either enlarging this critical region hold time and/or
> > +creating more kthreads.
> > +
> > +
> > +MODULE PARAMETERS
> > +
> > +This module has the following parameters:
> > +
> > +
> > +	    ** Locktorture-specific **
> > +
> > +nwriters_stress   Number of kernel threads that will stress exclusive lock
> > +		  ownership (writers). The default value is twice the amount
> 
> I would s/amount/number/ but that's minor.
> 
> > +		  of online CPUs.
> > +
> > +torture_type	  Type of lock to torture. By default, only spinlocks will
> > +		  be tortured. This module can torture the following locks,
> > +		  with string values as follows:
> > +
> > +		     o "lock_busted": Simulates a buggy lock implementation.
> > +
> > +		     o "spin_lock": spin_lock() and spin_unlock() pairs.
> > +
> > +		     o "spin_lock_irq": spin_lock_irq() and spin_unlock_irq()
> > +					pairs.
> > +
> > +torture_runnable  Start locktorture at module init. By default it will begin
> > +		  once the module is loaded.
> 
> What differences would that make?
> 
> > +
> > +
> > +	    ** Torture-framework (RCU + locking) **
> > +
> > +shutdown_secs	  The number of seconds to run the test before terminating
> > +		  the test and powering off the system.  The default is
> > +		  zero, which disables test termination and system shutdown.
> > +		  This capability is useful for automated testing.
> > +
> > +onoff_holdoff	  The number of seconds between each attempt to execute a
> > +		  randomly selected CPU-hotplug operation.  Defaults to
> > +		  zero, which disables CPU hotplugging.  In HOTPLUG_CPU=n
> 
> s/HOTPLUG_CPU/CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU/ to be consistent.
> 
> > +		  kernels, locktorture will silently refuse to do any
> > +		  CPU-hotplug operations regardless of what value is
> > +		  specified for onoff_interval.
> 
> eh?  what is                    onoff_interval ?
> 
> Oh, the param name (in leftmost column) above should be onoff_interval since
> onoff_holdoff is below.
> 
> > +
> > +onoff_holdoff	  The number of seconds to wait until starting CPU-hotplug
> > +		  operations.  This would normally only be used when
> > +		  locktorture was built into the kernel and started
> > +		  automatically at boot time, in which case it is useful
> > +		  in order to avoid confusing boot-time code with CPUs
> > +		  coming and going. This parameter is only useful if
> > +		  CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is enabled.
> > +
> > +stat_interval	  Number of seconds between statistics-related printk()s.
> > +		  By default, locktorture will report stats every 60 seconds.
> > +		  Setting the interval to zero causes the statistics to
> > +		  be printed -only- when the module is unloaded, and this
> > +		  is the default.
> > +
> > +stutter		  The length of time to run the test before pausing for this
> > +		  same period of time.  Defaults to "stutter=5", so as
> > +		  to run and pause for (roughly) five-second intervals.
> > +		  Specifying "stutter=0" causes the test to run continuously
> > +		  without pausing, which is the old default behavior.
> > +
> > +shuffle_interval  The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied
> > +		  to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds.
> > +		  Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz.
> > +
> > +verbose		  Enable verbose debugging printking, via printk(). Enabled
> 
> 			                           printing
> 
> > +		  by default. This extra information is mostly related to
> > +		  high-level errors and reports from the main 'torture'
> > +		  framework.
> > +
> > +
> > +STATISTICS
> > +
> > +Statistics are printed in the following format:
> > +
> > +spin_lock-torture: Writes:  Total: 93746064  Max/Min: 0/0   Fail: 0
> > +   (A)				   (B)		  (C)	       (D)
> > +
> > +(A): Lock type that is being tortured -- torture_type parameter.
> > +
> > +(B): Number of times the lock was acquired.
> > +
> > +(C): Min and max number of times threads failed to acquire the lock.
> > +
> > +(D): true/false values if there were errors acquiring the lock. This should
> > +     -only- be positive if there is a bug in the locking primitive's
> > +     implementation. Otherwise a lock should never fail (ie: spin_lock()).
> 
>                                                            (i.e., spin_lock()).
> 
> > +     Of course, the same applies for (C), above. A dummy example of this is
> > +     the "lock_busted" type.
> > +
> > +USAGE
> > +
> > +The following script may be used to torture locks:
> > +
> > +	#!/bin/sh
> > +
> > +	modprobe locktorture
> > +	sleep 3600
> > +	rmmod locktorture
> > +	dmesg | grep torture:
> > +
> > +The output can be manually inspected for the error flag of "!!!".
> > +One could of course create a more elaborate script that automatically
> > +checked for such errors.  The "rmmod" command forces a "SUCCESS",
> > +"FAILURE", or "RCU_HOTPLUG" indication to be printk()ed.  The first
> > +two are self-explanatory, while the last indicates that while there
> > +were no locking failures, CPU-hotplug problems were detected.
> > +
> > +Also see: Documentation/RCU/torture.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
index f7d99e2a5799..be715015e0f7 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST
 The CONFIG LOCK_TORTURE_TEST config option provides a kernel module
 that runs torture tests on core kernel locking primitives. The kernel
 module, 'locktorture', may be built after the fact on the running
-kernel to be tested, if desired. The tests periodically outputs status
+kernel to be tested, if desired. The tests periodically output status
 messages via printk(), which can be examined via the dmesg (perhaps
 grepping for "torture").  The test is started when the module is loaded,
 and stops when the module is unloaded. This program is based on how RCU
 is tortured, via rcutorture.
 
 This torture test consists of creating a number of kernel threads which
-acquires the lock and holds it for specific amount of time, thus simulating
+acquire the lock and hold it for specific amount of time, thus simulating
 different critical region behaviors. The amount of contention on the lock
 can be simulated by either enlarging this critical region hold time and/or
 creating more kthreads.
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ This module has the following parameters:
 	    ** Locktorture-specific **
 
 nwriters_stress   Number of kernel threads that will stress exclusive lock
-		  ownership (writers). The default value is twice the amount
+		  ownership (writers). The default value is twice the number
 		  of online CPUs.
 
 nreaders_stress   Number of kernel threads that will stress shared lock
@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ torture_type	  Type of lock to torture. By default, only spinlocks will
 
 		     o "rwsem_lock": read/write down() and up() semaphore pairs.
 
-torture_runnable  Start locktorture at module init. By default it will begin
-		  once the module is loaded.
+torture_runnable  Start locktorture at boot time in the case where the
+		  module is built into the kernel, otherwise wait for
+		  torture_runnable to be set via sysfs before starting.
+		  By default it will begin once the module is loaded.
 
 
 	    ** Torture-framework (RCU + locking) **
@@ -60,12 +62,12 @@ shutdown_secs	  The number of seconds to run the test before terminating
 		  zero, which disables test termination and system shutdown.
 		  This capability is useful for automated testing.
 
-onoff_holdoff	  The number of seconds between each attempt to execute a
-		  randomly selected CPU-hotplug operation.  Defaults to
-		  zero, which disables CPU hotplugging.  In HOTPLUG_CPU=n
-		  kernels, locktorture will silently refuse to do any
-		  CPU-hotplug operations regardless of what value is
-		  specified for onoff_interval.
+onoff_interval	  The number of seconds between each attempt to execute a
+		  randomly selected CPU-hotplug operation.  Defaults
+		  to zero, which disables CPU hotplugging.  In
+		  CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n kernels, locktorture will silently
+		  refuse to do any CPU-hotplug operations regardless of
+		  what value is specified for onoff_interval.
 
 onoff_holdoff	  The number of seconds to wait until starting CPU-hotplug
 		  operations.  This would normally only be used when
@@ -91,7 +93,7 @@ shuffle_interval  The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied
 		  to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds.
 		  Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz.
 
-verbose		  Enable verbose debugging printking, via printk(). Enabled
+verbose		  Enable verbose debugging printing, via printk(). Enabled
 		  by default. This extra information is mostly related to
 		  high-level errors and reports from the main 'torture'
 		  framework.
@@ -115,7 +117,7 @@ spin_lock-torture: Writes:  Total: 93746064  Max/Min: 0/0   Fail: 0
 
 (E): true/false values if there were errors acquiring the lock. This should
      -only- be positive if there is a bug in the locking primitive's
-     implementation. Otherwise a lock should never fail (ie: spin_lock()).
+     implementation. Otherwise a lock should never fail (i.e., spin_lock()).
      Of course, the same applies for (C), above. A dummy example of this is
      the "lock_busted" type.
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists