linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead !ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:49:14 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
Cc:	mjg59@...f.ucam.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead
 !ACPI_SUCCESS() for error checking

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:13:55AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> ACPI_SUCCESS is defined as:
> #define ACPI_SUCCESS(a)			(!(a))
> 
> There is no need for the the double ! since there is already a macro
> defined for failures: ACPI_FAILURE()
> 

Cc: linux-acpi

Thanks,

Darren

> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> index d45bca3..8c6a8fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_events(struct device *dev,
>  	acpi = to_acpi_device(dev);
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFFS", NULL, &value);
> -	if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value);
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_events(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFFS", value);
>  
> -	if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return count;
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_time(struct device *dev,
>  	acpi = to_acpi_device(dev);
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFTV", NULL, &value);
> -	if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_time(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFTV", value);
>  
> -	if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return count;
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/