[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140916230711.GA30918@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:07:11 -0700
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Use handle_simple_irq for IRQ dispatch chip
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014, Charles Keepax wrote:
> We use a dummy IRQ chip to dispatch interrupts to the two seperate IRQ
> domains on the Arizona devices. This is just a simple software IRQ chip
> and thus the current handle_edge_irq is unnecessary for its needs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> index 5e2f450..3a3fe7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int arizona_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *data = h->host_data;
>
> irq_set_chip_data(virq, data);
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &arizona_irq_chip, handle_edge_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &arizona_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
>
> /* ARM needs us to explicitly flag the IRQ as valid
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists