[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140916032212.GA7759@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:22:12 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@...s.com>
Cc: jespern@...s.com, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
edgar.iglesias@...il.com
Subject: Re: Status of 'cris' architecture support in Linux kernel
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:30:07AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:49:49PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Following up on Jesper's reply...
> >
> > > From: Jesper Nilsson <jespern@...s.com>
> > > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:52:03 +0200
> >
> > > > Toolchain
> > > >
> > > > Creating a toolchain from upstream sources required a number of patches.
> >
> > > > - gcc 4.7.4
> > > > Requires a backport from upstream gcc to compile.
> > > > Later versions of gcc (4.8.3, 4.9.1) fail with internal compiler errors
> > > > even after patching.
> >
> > This sounds like PR61737 (fixed; use 4.9.2 not released yet),
> > but of course with the above sentence serving as your complete
> > bug-report (or did I miss one?) that will only be a guess.
> >
> Confirmed; gcc 4.9.1 for crisv32 builds after applying the patch fixing
> PR61737 (and the patch to fic config.gcc) on top of gcc 4.9.1.
>
Not-so-good update: I got the toolchain with gcc 4.9.1 to build,
but the resulting image hangs early during boot. This does not happen
if I use the toolchain with gcc 4.7.4. Guess I'll stick with that.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists