[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410953151.3040.101.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:25:51 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 044/187] x86_64/entry/xen: Do not invoke espfix64
on Xen
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 15:07 -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> 3.13.11.7 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>
> commit 7209a75d2009dbf7745e2fd354abf25c3deb3ca3 upstream.
>
> This moves the espfix64 logic into native_iret. To make this work,
> it gets rid of the native patch for INTERRUPT_RETURN:
> INTERRUPT_RETURN on native kernels is now 'jmp native_iret'.
>
> This changes the 16-bit SS behavior on Xen from OOPSing to leaking
> some bits of the Xen hypervisor's RSP (I think).
>
> [ hpa: this is a nonzero cost on native, but probably not enough to
> measure. Xen needs to fix this in their own code, probably doing
> something equivalent to espfix64. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7b8f1d8ef6597cb16ae004a43c56980a7de3cf94.1406129132.git.luto@amacapital.net
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
[...]
There's another fix related to espfix on Xen, commit 8762e5092828
("x86/espfix/xen: Fix allocation of pages for paravirt page tables").
But I'm not sure whether it's actually needed after this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists