lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1410958454-7501-3-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:54:13 +0300
From:	Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
To:	bp@...en8.de
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, nadav.amit@...il.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 2/3] x86: Use new cpuid structs in cpuid functions

The current code that decodes cpuid fields is somewhat cryptic, since it uses
many bit operations.  Using cpuid structs instead for clarifying the code.
Introducign no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index e4ab2b4..b57c160 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #include <asm/pat.h>
 #include <asm/microcode.h>
 #include <asm/microcode_intel.h>
+#include <asm/cpuid_def.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
 #include <asm/uv/uv.h>
@@ -444,13 +445,17 @@ static void get_model_name(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
 void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	unsigned int n, dummy, ebx, ecx, edx, l2size;
+	unsigned int n, dummy, dummy2, l2size;
+	union cpuid8_5_ecx_edx ecx5, edx5;
+	union cpuid8_6_ebx ebx6;
+	union cpuid8_6_ecx ecx6;
 
 	n = c->extended_cpuid_level;
 
 	if (n >= 0x80000005) {
-		cpuid(0x80000005, &dummy, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-		c->x86_cache_size = (ecx>>24) + (edx>>24);
+		cpuid(0x80000005, &dummy, &dummy2, &ecx5.full, &edx5.full);
+		c->x86_cache_size = ecx5.split.cache_size +
+				    edx5.split.cache_size;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 		/* On K8 L1 TLB is inclusive, so don't count it */
 		c->x86_tlbsize = 0;
@@ -460,11 +465,11 @@ void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	if (n < 0x80000006)	/* Some chips just has a large L1. */
 		return;
 
-	cpuid(0x80000006, &dummy, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-	l2size = ecx >> 16;
+	cpuid(0x80000006, &dummy, &ebx6.full, &ecx6.full, &dummy2);
+	l2size = ecx6.split.cache_size;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	c->x86_tlbsize += ((ebx >> 16) & 0xfff) + (ebx & 0xfff);
+	c->x86_tlbsize += ebx6.split.dtlb_entries + ebx6.split.itlb_entries;
 #else
 	/* do processor-specific cache resizing */
 	if (this_cpu->legacy_cache_size)
@@ -505,9 +510,10 @@ void cpu_detect_tlb(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 void detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
-	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+	u32 eax, ecx, edx;
 	int index_msb, core_bits;
 	static bool printed;
+	union cpuid1_ebx ebx;
 
 	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HT))
 		return;
@@ -518,9 +524,9 @@ void detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY))
 		return;
 
-	cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx.full, &ecx, &edx);
 
-	smp_num_siblings = (ebx & 0xff0000) >> 16;
+	smp_num_siblings = ebx.split.max_logical_proc;
 
 	if (smp_num_siblings == 1) {
 		printk_once(KERN_INFO "CPU0: Hyper-Threading is disabled\n");
@@ -591,20 +597,22 @@ void cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	c->x86 = 4;
 	/* Intel-defined flags: level 0x00000001 */
 	if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000001) {
-		u32 junk, tfms, cap0, misc;
+		u32 junk, cap0;
+		union cpuid1_eax tfms;
+		union cpuid1_ebx misc;
 
-		cpuid(0x00000001, &tfms, &misc, &junk, &cap0);
-		c->x86 = (tfms >> 8) & 0xf;
-		c->x86_model = (tfms >> 4) & 0xf;
-		c->x86_mask = tfms & 0xf;
+		cpuid(0x00000001, &tfms.full, &misc.full, &junk, &cap0);
+		c->x86 = tfms.split.family_id;
+		c->x86_model = tfms.split.model;
+		c->x86_mask = tfms.split.stepping_id;
 
 		if (c->x86 == 0xf)
-			c->x86 += (tfms >> 20) & 0xff;
+			c->x86 += tfms.split.extended_family_id;
 		if (c->x86 >= 0x6)
-			c->x86_model += ((tfms >> 16) & 0xf) << 4;
+			c->x86_model += tfms.split.extended_model_id << 4;
 
-		if (cap0 & (1<<19)) {
-			c->x86_clflush_size = ((misc >> 8) & 0xff) * 8;
+		if (cap0 & (1 << (X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH & 31))) {
+			c->x86_clflush_size = misc.split.clflush_size * 8;
 			c->x86_cache_alignment = c->x86_clflush_size;
 		}
 	}
@@ -654,10 +662,11 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 
 	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000008) {
-		u32 eax = cpuid_eax(0x80000008);
+		union cpuid_8_8_eax eax;
 
-		c->x86_virt_bits = (eax >> 8) & 0xff;
-		c->x86_phys_bits = eax & 0xff;
+		eax.full = cpuid_eax(0x80000008);
+		c->x86_virt_bits = eax.split.virt_as;
+		c->x86_phys_bits = eax.split.phys_as;
 	}
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 	else if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PAE) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE36))
@@ -814,7 +823,10 @@ static void generic_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	get_cpu_cap(c);
 
 	if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000001) {
-		c->initial_apicid = (cpuid_ebx(1) >> 24) & 0xFF;
+		union cpuid1_ebx ebx;
+
+		ebx.full = cpuid_ebx(1);
+		c->initial_apicid = ebx.split.initial_apicid;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 # ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
 		c->apicid = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, 0);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ