[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54199240.7080705@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:53:04 +0200
From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...el.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...el.com,
samuel.ortiz@...el.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: Clear DIRECT_IRQ bit
Do you think a WARN necessary before clearing the bit?
Regards,
Loic
On 17/09/2014 15:18, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 03:30 PM, Loic Poulain wrote:
>> Direct Irq En bit can be initialized to a bad value.
>> This bit has to be cleared for io access mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
>> index 975572e..94902f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>
>> /* BYT_CONF0_REG register bits */
>> #define BYT_IODEN BIT(31)
>> +#define BYT_DIRECT_IRQ BIT(27)
>> #define BYT_TRIG_NEG BIT(26)
>> #define BYT_TRIG_POS BIT(25)
>> #define BYT_TRIG_LVL BIT(24)
>> @@ -232,7 +233,7 @@ static int byt_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>> /* For level trigges the BYT_TRIG_POS and BYT_TRIG_NEG bits
>> * are used to indicate high and low level triggering
>> */
>> - value &= ~(BYT_TRIG_POS | BYT_TRIG_NEG | BYT_TRIG_LVL);
>> + value &= ~(BYT_DIRECT_IRQ | BYT_TRIG_POS | BYT_TRIG_NEG | BYT_TRIG_LVL);
>>
>> switch (type) {
>> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>>
> Just checked that there is a patch already upstream that warns if this bit is set.
> It defines BYT_DIRECT_IRQ_EN already, but doesn't clear the bit.
>
> commit ff998356b644ebe723127bd9eec6040b59a4a4f6
> Author: Eric Ernst <eric.ernst@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 12 11:06:20 2014 -0700
>
> pinctrl: baytrail: Warn if direct IRQ GPIO set to output
>
>
> Maybe adding a patch clearing the bit on top of that patch?
>
> And send that patch to Linus Walleij as well (added to cc)
>
> Thanks
> -Mathias
--
Intel Open Source Technology Center
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists