[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140917152453.GF2168@dhcp128.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:24:55 +0200
From: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...atus.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: hub: remove obsolete while cycle in hub_event()
On Fri 12-09-14 10:23:26, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > The USB hub events are proceed by workqueue instead of kthread now.
> > The result is that hub_event() function processes only one event.
> > The while cycle was not removed earlier to show the real changes when
> > switching to the workqueue.
> >
> > This patch also consolidates the goto targets and rename them from "loop*"
> > to "out*".
> >
> > When touching the code, it fixes also formatting of dev_err() and dev_dbg()
> > calls to make checkpatch.pl happy :-)
>
> Although the reason given in the description above is not really
> accurate, removing the loop in hub_events is a reasonable thing to do.
> That loop doesn't serve any purpose as far as I can see.
IMHO, the while cycle was needed when hub_events() was used in
khubd thread. More events could had been added to the list before
the thread was scheduled.
Therefore I think that the above description makes sense.
And this is why I did not change the order of the patches in v2 of the patch
set. I sent all patches again because this one and the 3rd one needed
refresh.
Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists