[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W7xJ01m2oLtuDnogOmrpwpztbir=59oSWU6oojFYUWKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:47:54 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add rtc_src clk for s3c-rtc on exynos5250-snow
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
> commit 546b117fdf17 ("rtc: s3c: add support for RTC of Exynos3250 SoC")
> added an "rtc_src" DT property for the Samsung's S3C Real Time Clock
> controller that specifies the 32.768 kHz clock that uses the RTC as its
> source clock. In the case of the Exynos5250 based Snow board, the Maxim
> 77686 32kHz AP clock is used as the source clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
> index e51fcef..56eec56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> /dts-v1/;
> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h>
> #include "exynos5250.dtsi"
>
> / {
> @@ -29,6 +30,8 @@
>
> rtc@...E0000 {
> status = "okay";
> + clocks = <&clock CLK_RTC>, <&max77686 MAX77686_CLK_AP>;
> + clock-names = "rtc", "rtc_src";
Wait, seriously? Snow is still using the "rtc@...E0000" syntax?
Whatever happened to the series that Andreas worked so hard on,
including <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4664801/>?
Kukjin: Andreas's patch series was Reviewed long ago I think and by
now I'd imagine it's got some conflicts due to it not having been
applied in a timely fashion. Perhaps you could fix it up for Andreas
(since he's already rebased it several times) and land it?
If I had to guess, outstanding from Andreas's series (patchwork IDs listed):
4751131 New [v7] ARM: dts: Prepare node labels for exynos5250
4664801 New [v6,04/10] ARM: dts: Clean up exynos5250-snow
4664771 New [v6,05/10] ARM: dts: Fill in bootargs for exynos5250-snow
4664731 New [v6,06/10] ARM: dts: Clean up exynos5250-smdk5250
4664751 New [v6,07/10] ARM: dts: Clean up exynos5250-arndale
4664711 New [v6,08/10] ARM: dts: Fix apparent GPIO typo in
exynos5250-arndale
4664681 New [v6,09/10] ARM: dts: Simplify USB3503 on exynos5250-arndale
4664691 New [v6,10/10] ARM: dts: Add exynos5250-spring device tree
> };
>
> pinctrl@...00000 {
> @@ -350,7 +353,7 @@
> samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <378000>;
>
> - max77686@09 {
> + max77686: max77686@09 {
> compatible = "maxim,max77686";
> interrupt-parent = <&gpx3>;
> interrupts = <2 0>;
In any case, there's nothing wrong with Javier's patch other than the
fact that it will eventually need to get merged with Andreas's, so:
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists