[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UsB0r7UwnNsmzE_fEQnurE=Qf_vZQKidivGYajZX=-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:51:29 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/5] rtc: s3c: Add support for RTC of Exynos3250 SoC
Daniel,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> NOTE: I don't think that the builtin RTC is terribly important for any
>> exynos-based Chromebooks that I'm aware of. We rely on the RTC that's
>> part of the Maxim PMIC itself and pretty much ignore the one built-in
>> to the exynos. I think there are some cases it was used (as a
>> fallback wakeup source in certain test scripts), but nothing very
>> important.
>
> That's not true for all hardware though, at least the board I'm
> working on now has the SoC RTC as battery-backed and the PMIC one with
> no battery. So in this case at least, the interesting RTC is the SoC
> one.
Yup, I can totally believe that. My statement was meant only to apply
to the boards I knew about firsthand...
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists