[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140917183513.GS7960@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:35:13 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
	Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
	zhangqing <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: add devicetree bindings for st-pwm
 regulator
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:16:23AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> I _think_ that the "regulators" subnode and the "pwm-regulator"
> subnode are not needed at all and should be removed.  Other instances
> of devices that are "just" regulators don't have it (like
> fixed-regulator, gpio-regulator, etc).
> 
> I think your final example should be:
Yes, please.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
