[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140917203135.GC2068@nixos>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:31:35 -0400
From: Shea Levy <shea@...alevy.com>
To: Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setting FS_USERNS_MOUNT in btrfs_fs_type.fs_flags
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:12:14AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:54:48AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:05:00PM -0400, Shea Levy wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > What work would be required to mark btrfs_fs_type with FS_USERNS_MOUNT
> > > so that btrfs images can be mounted by unprivileged users within a user
> > > namespace (along with something like [1])? I'd like to be able to create
> > > disk images without having to start a VM (and --rootdir isn't flexible
> > > enough because I want to make subvolumes).
> >
> > Er... Which is to say, you have an audit of btrfs code making sure that
> > it can cope with arbitrary image hand-crafted by potential attacker?
>
> It definitely can't cope. The easiest places to find bugs are the
> hundreds of BUG_ON() sites, many can be triggered by on-disk structures.
> The sheer volume of those makes me trust that you could find much worse
> if you did a thorough audit.
>
> - z
> (fun related fact: distros automount btrfs images)
OK, so it seems like the answer to my question is "a helluva lot". Guess
I won't count on seeing it any time soon :)
Thanks,
Shea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists