[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5418FAE1.4030008@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:07:13 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Part2 v1 02/21] genirq: Introduce helper functions to support
stacked irq_chip
On 2014/9/17 1:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
>> +void irq_chip_ack_parent(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> + data = data->parent_data;
>> + if (data && data->chip && data->chip->irq_ack)
>> + data->chip->irq_ack(data);
>
> Why is this restricted to a single parent level and does not go down
> the whole stack?
Hi Thomas,
It happens to work on x86, and we want to achieve a bit
performance advantage by not walking down the whole stack.
If preferred, I will change it to walk the whole stack.
Regards!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists