linux-kernel - [RFC v2 5/5] Check for O_NONBLOCK in all read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5d2507ee57b30987a1bbd495dce565f4ef86fdef.1410983999.git.milosz@adfin.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:20:50 +0000
From:	Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@...net.de>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC v2 5/5] Check for O_NONBLOCK in all read_iter instances

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Go through filesystem paths and return EAGAIN if there's an operation (like
metadata) that would cause blocking.

Signed-off-by: Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>
---
 fs/cifs/file.c    |  6 ++++++
 fs/ocfs2/file.c   |  6 ++++++
 fs/pipe.c         |  3 ++-
 fs/read_write.c   | 17 +++++++++++------
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c |  4 ++++
 mm/shmem.c        |  4 ++++
 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 7c018a1..e7169ba 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -3005,6 +3005,9 @@ ssize_t cifs_user_readv(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 	struct cifs_readdata *rdata, *tmp;
 	struct list_head rdata_list;
 
+	if (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
 	len = iov_iter_count(to);
 	if (!len)
 		return 0;
@@ -3123,6 +3126,9 @@ cifs_strict_readv(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 	    ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0))
 		return generic_file_read_iter(iocb, to);
 
+	if (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
 	/*
 	 * We need to hold the sem to be sure nobody modifies lock list
 	 * with a brlock that prevents reading.
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
index 2930e23..d96f60d 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -2473,6 +2473,12 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
 			filp->f_path.dentry->d_name.name,
 			to->nr_segs);	/* GRRRRR */
 
+	/*
+	 * No non-blocking reads for ocfs2 for now.  Might be doable with
+	 * non-blocking cluster lock helpers.
+	 */
+	if (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
+		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	if (!inode) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 21981e5..212bf68 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 			 */
 			if (ret)
 				break;
-			if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
+			if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) ||
+			    (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)) {
 				ret = -EAGAIN;
 				break;
 			}
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 29b5823..a3efa95 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -833,14 +833,19 @@ static ssize_t do_readv_writev(int type, struct file *file,
 		file_start_write(file);
 	}
 
-	if (iter_fn)
+	if (iter_fn) {
 		ret = do_iter_readv_writev(file, type, iov, nr_segs, tot_len,
 						pos, iter_fn, flags);
-	else if (fnv)
-		ret = do_sync_readv_writev(file, iov, nr_segs, tot_len,
-						pos, fnv);
-	else
-		ret = do_loop_readv_writev(file, iov, nr_segs, pos, fn);
+	} else {
+		if (type == READ && (flags & RWF_NONBLOCK))
+			return -EAGAIN;
+
+		if (fnv)
+			ret = do_sync_readv_writev(file, iov, nr_segs, tot_len,
+							pos, fnv);
+		else
+			ret = do_loop_readv_writev(file, iov, nr_segs, pos, fn);
+	}
 
 	if (type != READ)
 		file_end_write(file);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index de5368c..cf61271 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -246,6 +246,10 @@ xfs_file_read_iter(
 
 	XFS_STATS_INC(xs_read_calls);
 
+	/* XXX: need a non-blocking iolock helper, shouldn't be too hard */
+	if (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
 	if (unlikely(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT))
 		ioflags |= XFS_IO_ISDIRECT;
 	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_NOCMTIME)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 0e5fb22..ca2cae2 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1531,6 +1531,10 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 	ssize_t retval = 0;
 	loff_t *ppos = &iocb->ki_pos;
 
+	/* XXX: should be easily supportable */
+	if (iocb->ki_rwflags & RWF_NONBLOCK)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
 	/*
 	 * Might this read be for a stacking filesystem?  Then when reading
 	 * holes of a sparse file, we actually need to allocate those pages,
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/