lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140918131751.GA8797@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:17:51 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [torture] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
 at (null)

Hi Paul,

> > > > plymouth-upstart-bridge: ply-event-loop.c:497: ply_event_loop_new: Assertion `loop->epoll_fd >= 0' failed.
> > > > /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh: line 5:  2580 Aborted                 plymouth --ping > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh: line 5:  2585 Aborted                 plymouth --ping > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > mount: proc has wrong device number or fs type proc not supported
> > > > /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh: line 5:  2601 Aborted                 plymouth --ping > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > /etc/rc6.d/S40umountfs: line 20: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > cat: /proc/1/maps: No such file or directory
> > > > umount: /var/run: not mounted
> > > > umount: /var/lock: not mounted
> > > > umount: /dev/shm: not mounted
> > > > mount: / is busy
> > > >  * Will now restart
> 
> Are these expected behavior?

Yes, because it's randconfig boot tests, the user space may well
complain about random stuff and I'll ignore them all as long as it
will eventually call the shutdown command to finish the test in time.  :)

> So again, I can invoke this commit without losing much (sendkey
> alt-sysrq-z is after all my friend), but it is not clear to me that we
> have gotten to the root of this problem.

Sorry about that! If you see any debug tricks that I can try, or
information I can collect, please let me know.

Regards,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ