[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1409181048290.894-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:50:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<kgene.kim@...sung.com>, <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] usb: host: ehci-exynos: Remove unnecessary usb-phy
support
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Now that we have completely moved from older USB-PHY drivers
> to newer GENERIC-PHY drivers for PHYs available with USB controllers
> on Exynos series of SoCs, we can remove the support for the same
> in our host drivers too.
>
> We also defer the probe for our host in case we end up getting
> EPROBE_DEFER error when getting PHYs.
Better now. But I didn't notice this the first time:
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + return ret;
> + } else if (ret != -ENOSYS && ret != -ENODEV) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Error retrieving usb2 phy: %d\n", ret);
> + return PTR_ERR(phy);
It doesn't make any real difference, but wouldn't you prefer to say
"return ret" here?
With or without that change, for both these two patches:
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists