[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0689062e28e13375241dcc64df2a398c9d606c64.1411054735.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:50:20 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: move memcg_update_cache_size to slab_common.c
The only reason why this function lives in memcontrol.c is that it
depends on memcg_caches_array_size. However, we can pass the new array
size immediately to it instead of new_id+1 so that it will be free of
any memcontrol.c dependencies.
So let's move this function to slab_common.c and make it static.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 -
mm/memcontrol.c | 114 ++++++++++++++------------------------------
mm/slab_common.c | 30 +++++++++++-
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 4d17242eeff7..19df5d857411 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -440,7 +440,6 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(struct page *page, int order);
int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
-int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups);
void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);
struct kmem_cache *
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b6bbb1e3e2ab..9431024e490c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -646,11 +646,13 @@ int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
+static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id);
+
static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
if (memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg)) {
static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
- ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, memcg->kmemcg_id);
+ memcg_free_cache_id(memcg->kmemcg_id);
}
/*
* This check can't live in kmem destruction function,
@@ -2892,19 +2894,45 @@ int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return memcg ? memcg->kmemcg_id : -1;
}
-static size_t memcg_caches_array_size(int num_groups)
+static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
{
- ssize_t size;
- if (num_groups <= 0)
- return 0;
+ int id, size;
+ int err;
+
+ id = ida_simple_get(&kmem_limited_groups,
+ 0, MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (id < 0)
+ return id;
- size = 2 * num_groups;
+ if (id < memcg_limited_groups_array_size)
+ return id;
+
+ /*
+ * There's no space for the new id in memcg_caches arrays,
+ * so we have to grow them.
+ */
+
+ size = 2 * (id + 1);
if (size < MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE)
size = MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE;
else if (size > MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE)
size = MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE;
- return size;
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_slab_mutex);
+ err = memcg_update_all_caches(size);
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_slab_mutex);
+
+ if (err) {
+ ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, id);
+ return err;
+ }
+ return id;
+
+}
+
+static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id)
+{
+ ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, id);
}
/*
@@ -2914,60 +2942,7 @@ static size_t memcg_caches_array_size(int num_groups)
*/
void memcg_update_array_size(int num)
{
- if (num > memcg_limited_groups_array_size)
- memcg_limited_groups_array_size = memcg_caches_array_size(num);
-}
-
-int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups)
-{
- struct memcg_cache_params *cur_params = s->memcg_params;
-
- VM_BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s));
-
- if (num_groups > memcg_limited_groups_array_size) {
- int i;
- struct memcg_cache_params *new_params;
- ssize_t size = memcg_caches_array_size(num_groups);
-
- size *= sizeof(void *);
- size += offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
-
- new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!new_params)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- new_params->is_root_cache = true;
-
- /*
- * There is the chance it will be bigger than
- * memcg_limited_groups_array_size, if we failed an allocation
- * in a cache, in which case all caches updated before it, will
- * have a bigger array.
- *
- * But if that is the case, the data after
- * memcg_limited_groups_array_size is certainly unused
- */
- for (i = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; i++) {
- if (!cur_params->memcg_caches[i])
- continue;
- new_params->memcg_caches[i] =
- cur_params->memcg_caches[i];
- }
-
- /*
- * Ideally, we would wait until all caches succeed, and only
- * then free the old one. But this is not worth the extra
- * pointer per-cache we'd have to have for this.
- *
- * It is not a big deal if some caches are left with a size
- * bigger than the others. And all updates will reset this
- * anyway.
- */
- rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params);
- if (cur_params)
- kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head);
- }
- return 0;
+ memcg_limited_groups_array_size = num;
}
static void memcg_register_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -4167,23 +4142,12 @@ static int __memcg_activate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (err)
goto out;
- memcg_id = ida_simple_get(&kmem_limited_groups,
- 0, MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ memcg_id = memcg_alloc_cache_id();
if (memcg_id < 0) {
err = memcg_id;
goto out;
}
- /*
- * Make sure we have enough space for this cgroup in each root cache's
- * memcg_params.
- */
- mutex_lock(&memcg_slab_mutex);
- err = memcg_update_all_caches(memcg_id + 1);
- mutex_unlock(&memcg_slab_mutex);
- if (err)
- goto out_rmid;
-
memcg->kmemcg_id = memcg_id;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->memcg_slab_caches);
@@ -4204,10 +4168,6 @@ static int __memcg_activate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
out:
memcg_resume_kmem_account();
return err;
-
-out_rmid:
- ida_simple_remove(&kmem_limited_groups, memcg_id);
- goto out;
}
static int memcg_activate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 9c29ba792368..800314e2a075 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -120,6 +120,33 @@ static void memcg_free_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s)
kfree(s->memcg_params);
}
+static int memcg_update_cache_params(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_memcgs)
+{
+ int size;
+ struct memcg_cache_params *new_params, *cur_params;
+
+ BUG_ON(!is_root_cache(s));
+
+ size = offsetof(struct memcg_cache_params, memcg_caches);
+ size += num_memcgs * sizeof(void *);
+
+ new_params = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new_params)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cur_params = s->memcg_params;
+ memcpy(new_params->memcg_caches, cur_params->memcg_caches,
+ memcg_limited_groups_array_size * sizeof(void *));
+
+ new_params->is_root_cache = true;
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(s->memcg_params, new_params);
+ if (cur_params)
+ kfree_rcu(cur_params, rcu_head);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
@@ -130,9 +157,8 @@ int memcg_update_all_caches(int num_memcgs)
if (!is_root_cache(s))
continue;
- ret = memcg_update_cache_size(s, num_memcgs);
+ ret = memcg_update_cache_params(s, num_memcgs);
/*
- * See comment in memcontrol.c, memcg_update_cache_size:
* Instead of freeing the memory, we'll just leave the caches
* up to this point in an updated state.
*/
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists