[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140918162638.GA3950@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:26:38 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...oical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: remove unnecessary blk_clear_rq_complete()
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:33:35AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Why yo you think it's not nessecary? The request is not in the drivers
>
> The COMPLETED flag will be cleared in blk_mq_start_request(), so
> it needn't to be cleared here, and it is a bit early and might cause
> a tiny race window.
>
> > hand at this point, so it should not be marked started. Maybe I'm missing
> > something, but this sounds like it could very likely cause regressions.
>
> The STARTED flag has been cleared in __blk_mq_requeue_request(),
> I mean the COMPLETED flag, consider the following situation:
>
> - one req is queued to driver, and the req is completed from
> the device just before its timeout expired
> - the driver checks the result and finds it need to requeue for some reason
> - blk_mq_requeue_request() is called to requeue the req
> - COMPLETED is cleared before clearing STARTED because of
> writes reorder
> - timeout just comes between the two writes
> - then the request may be completed another time because of timeout
Ok, I guess you are right on this one. Objection cleared.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists