linux-kernel - Re: blk-mq crash under KVM in multiqueue block code (with virtio-blk and ext4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVNivj3Y-gzto2tQAenR4fwQDUTYob703ZogUjNcz7=V5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:13:12 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization List <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: blk-mq crash under KVM in multiqueue block code (with virtio-blk
 and ext4)

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:09 AM, David Hildenbrand
<dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Another way would be to ensure that the timeout handler doesn't touch hw_ctx
>> > or tag_sets that aren't fully initialized yet. But I think this is
>> > safer/cleaner.
>>
>> That may not be easy or enough to check if hw_ctx/tag_sets are
>> fully initialized if you mean all requests have been used one time.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 PM, David Hildenbrand
>> > I was playing with a simple patch that just sets cmd_flags and action_flags to
>>
>> What is action_flags?
>
> atomic_flags, sorry :)
>
> Otherwise e.g. REQ_ATOM_STARTED could already be set due to the randomness. I
> am not sure if this is really necessary, or if it is completely shielded by the
> tag-handling code, but seemed to be clean for me to do it (and I remember it
> not being set within blk_mq_rq_ctx_init).

You are right, both cmd_flags and atomic_flags should be cleared
in blk_mq_init_rq_map().

>
>>
>> > 0. That should already be sufficient to hinder blk_mq_tag_to_rq and the calling
>> > method to do the wrong thing.
>>
>> Yes, clearing rq->cmd_flags should be enough.
>>
>> And looks better to move rq initialization to __blk_mq_free_request()
>> too, otherwise timeout still may see old cmd_flags and rq->q before
>> rq's new initialization.
>
> Yes, __blk_mq_free_request() should also reset at least rq->cmd_flags, and I
> think we can remove the initialization from  __blk_mq_alloc_request().
>
> David
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>



-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/