linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v8 08/10] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_REGISTER, PR_MPX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE017B3436@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 02:37:50 +0000
From:	"Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To:	Kevin Easton <kevin@...rana.org>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 08/10] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_REGISTER,
 PR_MPX_UNREGISTER



On 2014-09-18, Kevin Easton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:40:29AM +0000, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
>>> Would it be prudent to use an error code other than EINVAL for the
>>> "hardware doesn't support it" case?
>>> 
>> Seems like no specific error code for this case.
> 
> ENXIO would probably be OK.  It's not too important as long as it's
> documented.
> 
Yes. Looks like that ENXIO will be better.

Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/