lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:11:51 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com> Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>, "<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, "<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "<HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org>" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: llite: Use kzalloc and rewrite null tests On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:57:03AM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote: > 4. Sometimes we need large allocations. general kmalloc is less > reliable as system lives on and memory fragmentation worsens. So we > have this "allocations over 2-4 pages get switched to vmalloc" logic, > if there's a way to do that automatically - that would be great. Julia's patch only changes OBD_ALLOC() functions and those are always kmalloc so that's not an issue here. The OBD_ALLOC_LARGE() macro is vmalloc() or kmalloc() if the size is small enough. We don't really want to choose between kmalloc and vmalloc automatically. My instinct is that we should change all the OBD_ALLOC_LARGE() to vmalloc() and trust it to allocate them in the most sane way possible. But I haven't really looked very closely. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists