[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140919114529.GD5366@x2.net.home>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:45:29 +0200
From: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
brice.goglin@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: new topology for multi-NUMA-node CPUs
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:33:34PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The sysfs effects here cause an issue with the hwloc tool where
> it gets confused and thinks there are more sockets than are
> physically present.
>
> Before this patch, there are two packages:
>
> # cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/
> # cat cpu*/topology/physical_package_id | sort | uniq -c
> 18 0
> 18 1
>
> But 4 _sets_ of core siblings:
>
> # cat cpu*/topology/core_siblings_list | sort | uniq -c
> 9 0-8
> 9 18-26
> 9 27-35
> 9 9-17
>
> After this set, there are only 2 sets of core siblings, which
> is what we expect for a 2-socket system.
>
> # cat cpu*/topology/physical_package_id | sort | uniq -c
> 18 0
> 18 1
> # cat cpu*/topology/core_siblings_list | sort | uniq -c
> 18 0-17
> 18 18-35
hmm... it would be also nice to test it with lscpu(1) from
util-linux (but it uses maps rather than lists from cpu*/topology/).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists