lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:34:14 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: git rid of [sched_delayed] message for printk_deferred On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:31:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I totally didn't get what you wrote. :-) > We don't want to know if it got delayed, then the patch to remove that > print seems correct. Why would you not want to know that? Also was that the actual argument? Lemme go check the earlier emails -- I cannot find that argument in the first few emails. > But how did it get delayed if we don't know if it got delayed and > don't want to know? If you cannot prove something didn't happen it must have happened :-) > Are my meds still that strong??? Either that or I'm just incoherent, I get that while traveling. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists