[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140919160555.GD4723@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:05:55 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Move BTRFS RCU string to common library
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:47:53AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>
> On 09/19/2014 11:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:01:28AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >> This patch series moves the generic RCU string library used internally by BTRFS
> >> to be accessible by anyone. It provides printk_in_rcu and
> >> printk_ratelimited_in_rcu to print these strings. In order to avoid a weird
> >> inconsistency between the two, the first patch fixes printk_ratelimited so it
> >> passes on the return value from printk.
> >>
> >> The second patch actually moves the RCU string library. Version 2 passes on the
> >> return values from printk{,_ratelimited} and fixes some style issues.
> >>
> >> Omar Sandoval (2):
> >
> > For the series:
> >
> > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Fine by me too, Paul, do you want to merge it in?
I would be happy to.
Are you thinking in terms of 3.18 or 3.19? These look OK either way, but
thought I should check.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists