[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541C6A6A.40006@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:39:54 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: lee.jones@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, linux@....linux.org.uk,
vikas.sajjan@...sung.com, joshi@...sung.com, naushad@...sung.com,
thomas.ab@...sung.com, chow.kim@...sung.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
b29396@...escale.com, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from platform
devices
On 19.09.2014 17:11, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(np) ||
>
> Wouldn't it be enough to simply call of_find_device_by_node(np) and if
> it fails then instead create a dummy device?
>
>> + of_node_test_and_set_flag(np, OF_POPULATED)) {
One more thing I forgot to mention, the call to
of_node_test_and_set_flag() is also wrong, because it sets the flag,
marking the device as already populated, while it isn't.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists