[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140919131336.75ee47d6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:13:36 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Lukasz Pawelczyk <l.pawelczyk@...sung.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the file-locks
tree
Hi James,
Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in
security/smack/smack_lsm.c between commit 1f5a9ba7910c ("security: make
security_file_set_fowner, f_setown and __f_setown void return") from
the file-locks tree and commit 21c7eae21a21 ("Make Smack operate on
smack_known struct where it still used char*") from the security tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 69e5635d89e5,93dc876734a4..000000000000
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@@ -1394,7 -1574,8 +1574,7 @@@ static void smack_file_set_fowner(struc
{
struct smack_known *skp = smk_of_current();
- file->f_security = skp->smk_known;
+ file->f_security = skp;
- return 0;
}
/**
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists