linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LSM: Pass comm name via get_task_comm() [was: Re: [PATCH] Change task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:30:14 -0400
From:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, joe@...ches.com,
	keescook@...omium.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Pass comm name via get_task_comm() [was: Re:
 [PATCH] Change task_struct->comm to use RCU.]

On 14/03/27, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 03/27/2014 01:20 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/03/12, James Morris wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >>
> >>> And the same phrase goes to James Morris...
> >>>
> >>> If you are sure that it is safe to use get_task_comm() from
> >>> dump_common_audit_data() and you prefer locked version, please pick up below
> >>> patch via your git tree.
> >>>
> >>> If you are unsure or prefer lockless version, I'll make a lockless version
> >>> using do_get_task_comm() proposed in this thread.
> >>
> >> If you can't understand whether your patch is correct or not, don't ask me 
> >> to apply it to my tree.
> >>
> >> If you're unsure, get it reviewed first.
> > 
> > Steve (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/11/218 ) and James,
> > 
> > Are the labels on data output in LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK even right?  The
> > general case gives pid and comm of current.  Then the
> > LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK case gives pid and comm from the task handed in in
> > the struct common_audit_data pointer.  They are a duplicate of the
> > general case without generating a new message.  I expect this will cause
> > ausearch to ignore those latter two fields.  Should the latter two be
> > renamed to something like ad_pid= and ad_comm= ?
> 
> Hmmm..only seems to be used by Smack.
> SELinux had a tsk field in common_audit_data that was removed by
> b466066.  This other tsk field seems to have been added for Smack by
> 6e837fb.
> 
> That said, it would be nice to have pid/comm info for the target of a
> signal check as well as current.

Reviving a bit of an old thread...

Probably the appropriate keywords would be opid= and ocomm= for the
target (object).

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@...hat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/