[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140919035203.GA28292@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:52:03 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > Oww.. This is double indirection deal there. A percpu offset pointing to
> > a pointer?
> >
> > Generally the following is true (definition from
> > include/asm-generic/percpu.h that is used for ARM for raw_cpu_read):
> >
> > #define raw_cpu_read_4(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
>
> I think what the issue is that we dropped the fetch of the percpu offset
> in the patch. Instead we are using the address of the variable that
> contains the offset. Does this patch fix it?
>
>
> Subject: irqchip: Properly fetch the per cpu offset
>
> The raw_cpu_read() conversion dropped the fetch of the offset
> from base->percpu_base in gic_get_percpu_base.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Applied to percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists