linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541CAC81.9040404@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:21:53 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 19

On 09/19/14 14:14, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 04:58:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20140917:
>>
>> The fsl tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
>> next-20140917.
>>
>> The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The security tree gained a conflict against the file-locks tree.
>>
>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6014
>>  5488 files changed, 217522 insertions(+), 129375 deletions(-)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> Guess this is most difficult one.
> 
> mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig:
> 
> warning: (SCSI_BNX2X_FCOE && LIBFCOE && TCM_QLA2XXX) selects LIBFC which has
> unmet direct dependencies (SCSI_LOWLEVEL && SCSI && SCSI_FC_ATTRS)
> warning: (SCSI_BNX2X_FCOE && LIBFCOE && TCM_QLA2XXX) selects LIBFC which has
> unmet direct dependencies (SCSI_LOWLEVEL && SCSI && SCSI_FC_ATTRS)

Yes, I have a patch sitting on my hard drive that makes LIBFCOE and TCM_QLA2XXX
and SCSI_BNX2X_FCOE depend on SCSI_FC_ATTRS, but I'm not entirely happy about
having to hunt these down (even with the help of kconfig warnings).

I'm pretty sure that I can fix these (above and build errors below), but
there is still a bunch of nasty kconfig warnings that I don't understand
and don't know how to fix:

(powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:

warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && BLUESTONE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && EIGER && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 460SX && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_RGMII which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && 440EP && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GP && 440GX && 460SX && 405GP) selects IBM_EMAC_ZMII which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && 440GX && 460EX && 460SX && APM821xx) selects IBM_EMAC_TAH which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && AKEBONO && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 440SPe && 460EX && 460SX && APM821xx && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_EMAC4 which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && 440EP && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GP && 440GX && 460SX && 405GP) selects IBM_EMAC_ZMII which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && BLUESTONE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && EIGER && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 460SX && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_RGMII which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && 440GX && 460EX && 460SX && APM821xx) selects IBM_EMAC_TAH which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && AKEBONO && 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 440SPe && 460EX && 460SX && APM821xx && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_EMAC4 which has unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && NET_VENDOR_IBM)


git bisect also points to the SCSI_NETLINK dependency commit for these (unless
I did the bisect incorrectly).

Does anyone have a clue on these?
Thanks.


> followed by:
> 
> ERROR: "scsi_is_fc_rport" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "fc_get_event_number" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_trim" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "fc_host_post_event" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "__alloc_skb" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "fc_remote_port_delete" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "kfree_skb" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "fc_block_scsi_eh" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "fc_remote_port_add" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_put" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_clone" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "dev_get_by_name" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "register_netdevice_notifier" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "unregister_netdevice_notifier" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_trim" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "__netdev_alloc_skb" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "__pskb_pull_tail" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_queue_purge" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "__ethtool_get_settings" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_push" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_pull" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "init_net" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_queue_tail" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "kfree_skb" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_dequeue" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "consume_skb" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "dev_queue_xmit" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "skb_put" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "dev_get_stats" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.ko] undefined!
> 
> The problem is that there are many different errors seen at various stages
> during bisect, making a bisect a bit tricky.
> 
> --------
> At commit 'xfrm: Generate blackhole routes only from route lookup functions',
> the error is:
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c: In function 'fc_host_post_event':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:543:7: error: 'scsi_nl_sock' undeclared
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c: In function 'fc_host_post_vendor_event':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c:611:7: error: 'scsi_nl_sock' undeclared
> 
> --------
> At commit 'bnx2i/bnx2fc : fix randconfig error in next-20140909' and
> 'scsi_netlink : Make SCSI_NETLINK dependent on NET instead of selecting NET',
> the error is:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `scsi_nl_rcv_msg':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_netlink.c:114: undefined reference to `netlink_ack'
> drivers/scsi/scsi_netlink.c:116: undefined reference to `skb_pull'
> drivers/scsi/scsi_netlink.c:80: undefined reference to `netlink_capable'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `netlink_kernel_create':
> include/linux/netlink.h:60: undefined reference to `init_net'
> include/linux/netlink.h:60: undefined reference to `init_net'
> include/linux/netlink.h:60: undefined reference to `__netlink_kernel_create'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `scsi_netlink_exit':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_netlink.c:153: undefined reference to `netlink_kernel_release'
> 
> -------
> 
> Bisect reports commit 5d6be6a5d486 ('scsi_netlink : Make SCSI_NETLINK dependent
> on NET instead of selecting NET') as first bad commit.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/